Vote for Pieter Friedrich

2004-02-27T16:56:00.000-08:00

Gays - Pieter is On Your Dicks
Cross-posted at Byte Back.

What with this Federal Marriage Amendment in the air, it is a good time to revisit Pieter. You remember Pieter from Halloween last year. Once he found out Michael Demmons (Discountblogger) was gay, Pieter "Dominatrix' Dream" Friedrich wondered why Demmons had linked to him and wanted his filthy gay association removed from his person, so to speak.

You know Pieter, he of the "Damn, wish I'd bought Godhatesfags.com first but maybe assholeinvitation.com is available," demands to be taken seriously on the issue of gays in America when he starts his post off thusly:

The queers who are receiving "marriage" licenses in San Francisco like to portray themselves as victims.

And Pieter, if he was a little bigger (in the arms - you've got such a gutter mind) would love to make them victims, I'm sure. After all, if hate is Christian behavior than violence is, too (one's merely mental violence, the other purely physical).

See ladies and gentlemen it's quite simple. Pieter sets the record, um, straight:

Everyone, homosexual or straight, enjoys an equal right to marriage. Every male has the right to marry a woman and every female has the right to marry a man. And so, an of-age male homosexual may marry an of-age woman and an of-age lesbian may marry an of-age man.

Quite the rapier wit. Why can't we non-Pieterheads see this? [NB, just a semantical thing - but Pieter likes that - but you'd be hard-pressed to find a man or a woman not "of age."]

Love the elegant comment from one Aaron Butler: If it's not the Bible that's inconsistent, but rather our interpretation of it, how do you know that?

With his creative juices flowing - see other examples here, here, and here - Pieter tells quite a story about homosexual moans. Gotta read it. Fabulous stuff, dahling.

(Psst. See right about now, Pieter thinks I'm a flaming gay. He cannot fathom how non-gays can tolerate these butthole surfers - for surely that is how he thinks of them).

Pieter lays a claim (read the comments there) that "the law" already defines marriage as between a man and a woman. Wish he'd tell the, admittedly much less Christian, Bush that because the president seems to think some type of amendment is in order.

People who think they are clever, but aren't are fun. I play with them. They never are hard .. to figure out.

Pieter also thinks his commentators misunderstand his point - when in reality they understand it all too well and can't quite fathom the puzzle, wrapped in a mystery, flooded by an enema.

7-Most likely to get Pieter Friedrich excited.

2003-10-25T08:20:00.000-07:00

"From the beginning, the Bush administration has taken inordinate pride in keeping a tight news hole."

From this here.

To anyone who asks, I'm having fun, yes. Everyone has multiple sides and this is one small part (sorry Pieter, didn't mean to say that out loud) of who I am.

6-If not the GOP, who? The wonderful world of Pieter Friedrich's wisdom

2003-10-25T08:09:00.000-07:00

Comments at other sites such as Beautiful Feet.

Nice guy, I'm sure. Terrible president.
Posted by Pieter Friedrich at September 27, 2003 09:11 AM
...
Oh, because he took us into an illegitimate war in Iraq. He lied about that same war. He's increased the size of the government drastically. He's set to be the biggest spender since Johnson. He's done nothing for the pro-life movement. He's nominated good judges but not supported them. He's appointed several open homosexuals to his administration. He's got us into Liberia.

I could go on, but those are some of my major beefs.
Posted by Pieter Friedrich at September 29, 2003 10:52 AM

5-Somebody else posted about the Pieter Friedrich lifestyle

2003-10-25T08:02:00.000-07:00

VOTE for Pieter - he's a hands-on go-getter. Selfish as always, of course.
Pieter Friedrich Shatters Masturbation World Record!
October 25, 2003

It's official, Pieter Friedrich is the new king of masturbation. In a stunning feat of endurance and determination, Pieter Friedrich achieved 36 orgasms in a 24 hour period!

Sleeping intermittently during the 24 hour marathon, Pieter Friedrich remained focused and aroused by his impressive library of pornographic films. With over 400 films in his library and 3 televisions playing movies at all times, he had a continuous stream of footage to aid him in his quest.

It is apparent by the massive development of the muscles in his forearm that Pieter Friedrich is not your average masturbator. In an interview with UJ reporters after the record setting event, Pieter Friedrich was quoted as saying, "masturbation for me is a way of life. I've been training for this day since I was 13 years old and I'm happy with my performance today."

Correction: The phrase "impressive library of porngraphic films" should have read "impressive library of bestiality films." The record will correct itself.
Go here for the rest of the story.

4-Second time Pieter Friedrich Mentioned At My blog

2003-10-24T21:33:00.000-07:00

ORIGINALLY POSTED OCT 22

MORE UNCHRISTIANLIKE BEHAVIOR BY PIETER FRIEDRICH

He posts again aboout his hatred of homosexuals, exhibting not even the standard canard that he loves them as all God's creatures.

Joel Thomas made the pithiest and contrarian (and right) posts there. Including one to a Josh:

>>Josh,

"One of these things is not like the other." Well, I don't have a Jewish, black or Native American brother, but I do have a gay brother. I see in him the love of Christ more than I see it here.

And there it is in a nutshell. There are many people here who are gladly and willingly exhibiting a dereliction of duty to fellow man. Please visit my site for an expanded post on the subject of the wasted sperm at this site.

I am, as you are, quite willing to embrace hate to make a point. God bless fools and their brothers.

Also Pieter Friedrich professes false chivalry with this post. False because the words before are ACTUALLY starkly disgusting and because he quite obviously is one of those men who woudl expect and maybe demand that his wife should do all the cooking and cleaning around the house. And he would likely frown and demand that she not actually get paid or express such emasculating traits as independence.

Here are other Pieter Friedrich sites.

He reviews Hound of the Baskervilles at http://houndbypieter.blogspot.com/

He reviews Anthem by Ayn Rand at http://anthembypieter.blogspot.com/

He likes music at http://musichelikes.blogspot.com/

He likes films at http://flickshelikes.blogspot.com/

He writes "The Mule" at http://themulebypieter.blogspot.com/ a morailty tale in which he repeatedly types "shit" though bans a comment at his site for being profane. Oh and "fuck" too. If you want to use it - and its box opening scene with officers Yin and Yang scene ripped from Raiders of the Lost Ark - don't do it without permission and e-mail Pieter at pieter @ softanswer.com.

He is also the dude at http://pieterthedude.blogspot.com/

I only post this in case he goes through with his threat to run for public office and because today he posted another post about homosexuals living a hateful and evil lifetstyle just by existing - and doing so in an obvious attempt to piss off others - AKA Marilyn Manson syndrome.

3-First Time Pieter Friedrich Mentioned At My Home Blog

2003-10-24T21:31:00.000-07:00

PIETER FRIEDRICH PLAYS WITH HIMSELF BECAUSE NOBODY ELSE WILL
For all he knows Jesus was gay - he never married and hung around with men a lot

Friedrich is also a gay-hating Christian (yeah I know oxymoron and all that). No really. See.

The title is a joke but Jesus Fucking Christ on a pogostick what a dumbass. He has a site, which as he describes it, seems to want to turn away readers:

[T]he primary purpose of my blog is not discussion...it is soap-boxing, if you will, or teaching. The primary purpose of this blog is to be a forum where I can lay out my opinions. Discussion is an entirely secondary purpose.

NB forum - a public meeting place for open discussion

So why does the emotionally stunted Pieter Friedrich have comments? According to him it's just to get an Amen from those who already agree with him. The closest he can get to a girl is his blogging partner in Detriot. Someone has "needy" issues.

Of course, I'm only getting this through his evangelical "start a discussion but don't particiapte in it and certainly don't consider other views" blog. He may be a real nice fellow in person. Somehow I doubt it.

But he surely will get to heaven .. uh .. maybe. Of course, if I had to look and live like that I'd expect something better, as well.

Oh wait ... Can assholes really get to heaven?

PS The above was a deliberate attempt to goad a sad speck of life who has way too much time on his bloody hands to do anything real but spend all his life trying to convince others of Christianity. That would be different from fathers and priests and pastors who actually help people AND try to convince others of Christianity.

PPS Pieter, probably the son of Steven Friedrich, has just turned 18, so is perhaps still exploring his sexuality. For all he knows he may be in for a big surprise. In his own words: I believe in constitutional republican Christian theocracy. ... I'm currently enrolled in Michael Masterson's Accelerated Program for Six-Figure Copywriting [ED note" Blurb - "Learn How To Write A Book in ONLY 14Days!" So good and accomplished a company that they've established their own Web site. Oh wait, no they haven't. Also affliated with the esteemed . ahem .. Agora Publishing. )... I hope to be elected to state political office someday.

PPPS Knowing he is 18 has taken some of the fun out of this.

PPPPS He's got the wildly gay Cutting Crew down as a favorite band.

PPPPPS He's got Raymond Chandler down as a favorite author in his Amazon Wish List, no doubt for that scene in "The Big Sleep" where a homsexual boy is beaten up by police.

PPPPPPS I want him to delink Lord of the Rings and especially Ray Bradbury. Now. This minute. STAT. ASAP.

update 17:28 Evangelist = Evil's Agent

2-A Display of Pieter Friedrich's intellect.

2003-10-24T20:41:00.000-07:00

ORIGINALLY POSTED OCT. 22 Please do visit that first link "impossible." It is an unfathomable display of genius - and Pieter Friedrich would be the first to tell you that.
Homosexuality: A Hate-Filled Lifestyle

It is impossible for a homosexual "couple" to love each other. Indeed, short of taking another's life, engaging in homosexuality is one of the most hateful things a person can do.

The late David Chilton, a pastor, writer, and theologian, wrote in his book Power in the Blood: A Christian Response to AIDS (no, the book was not published in 1940 as Amazon says; it was published in 1987), that "homosexuals...are willfully and deliberately engaged in dangerous, destructive activities."

The homosexual agenda - even that agenda which consists of nothing more than getting up, going to work, coming home, entertaining oneself, and engaging in sexual activity with one's partner - is evil, perverse, and hateful.

One reason is because homosexual activities are in blatant violation of God's Law, and since one expresses love for God by obeying Him, and since the opposite of love is hate, it follows that homosexuals hate God.

Another reason is that, to quote Chilton, "As it is commonly practiced...homosexuality would seem to have more in common with torture and human sacrifice." Homosexuals hate each other. They won't say so, of course, but their actions speak louder than their words.

I am going to present my readers with detailed information about what homosexuality actually entails. The information I will present is excerpted from the chapter "Deathstyle: AIDS and the Divine Judgment" in Power in the Blood by David Chilton.

The information I will present my readers with is sickening and in anything but good taste. However, protesting the lack of taste in the following excerpt while simultaneously defending homosexuality (or at the very least refusing to condemn it) is, to quote Chilton, "a standard perversion of our age, which stresses refinement over decency, aesthetics over ethics. Let us not have morality, but please, please, let us have good taste!"

I am presenting this information for the same reasons I show pictures of aborted babies to pro-choicers or pictures of gassed Jews to anti-Semites or those who have forgotten the Jewish Holocaust. I present this information because sometimes it must be presented to, as Chilton said,"help convince confused people [that homosexuality is evil]."

I must warn my readers first, however. Though it is presented in clinical terms, the following information is very graphic. I request that, at the very least, any unmarried ladies (young or old) refrain from reading the presented materials. It goes without saying that I cannot enforce that request, but I do ask that unmarried female readers of "Deux Ego" honor it.

Because of the graphic nature of the materials, I will have placed them on a separate page rather than on the front page of "Deux Ego."
-----

Read Chilton's information here. While reading it please keep in mind that it contains nothing but pure and scientific fact...it speaks only to the physically damaging nature of homosexuality, and does not address the immoral and sinful nature of homosexuality.

-----
Have you read it?

Do you still believe homosexuality is normal, just another lifestyle, and entirely moral?

Scott Lively, who heads up Abiding Truth Ministries, has this to say: "1) Normality is that which functions according to its design, 2) the heterosexual design of the human body and the natural family is self-evident, 3) respecting the design of life produces good results (conversely, rejecting that design produces bad results) and 4) simple observation validates these assumptions. No special education or 'scientific' study is required."

Now read this:

David Chilton writes in another chapter of Power in the Blood:

"It is of crucial importance to understand at the outset that counseling a homosexual is no different, in principle, than counseling anyone else. The reason for this is simple: homosexuality is a sin, and must be dealt with as a sin.

"To many, that will seem to be a cruel, insensitive attitude, a 'homophobic' response of condemnation rather than concern. But the truth is that it is the beginning of true freedom and joy for the homosexual. For if homosexuality were either an inescapable human condition (like height and skin color) or an incurable disease, there would be no hope. The homosexual would be locked into his lusts forever, with no possibility of escape. Once we see clearly that homosexuality is a sin, we can also see the way of deliverance.

"That homosexuality is a sin means that it is only a sin - nothing more. It is not some mystical force within the person, some genetic or psychological programming that cannot be overcome. It is a transgression of God's law, a form of self-love that expresses itself in a particularly heinous attack on God's image. Like very sin, it is not ontological (having to do with a person's being as such); it is ethical. It is not rooted in the essential nature of humanity as God created us; it is rooted in the fall of man in the Garden of Eden, when man became alienated from God, from himself, from his society, from the world around him."

If you are a homosexual, or a sinner of any kind, I ask that you remember Romans 5:8-11. It reads:

"But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Much more then, having now been justified by His blood, we shall be saved from wrath through Him. For if when we were enemies we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son, much more, having been reconciled, we shall be saved by His life. And not only that, but we also rejoice in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have now received the reconciliation."

I was a sinner, wretched and unrepentant and destined for Hell as just payment for my sins. I turned to Jesus Christ, however, accepted His blood atonement for my sins, and was forgiven by and reconciled with God.

If you are an unrepentant sinner, you need to do the same thing. You need reconciliation.

If you have not accepted Jesus Christ as your Savior, then please take the time to read "The Incomparable Christ," "Who Is This Jesus Christ Anyway?," and "The Undeserving Love of God."

Also, if you are a homosexual, you need to know that you must repent of your sin or suffer eternal punishment in Hell. Homosexuals cannot continue in their sin and be Christians. In his article, "Are People Born Homosexual?," Glenn Dunehow says:

"A Christian is a person who lives in obedience to the teachings of Jesus Christ, regardless of the personal sacrifice, recognizing Christ's teachings to be ultimate truth. Such obedience is made possible when a person is 'born again' as a result of faith in what Christ did on His cross to redeem sinful man. After being born again, a person is enabled to abandon all things which God declares to be sinful. As proof of his faith, a true Christian will no longer live in a state of continual sin. He will no longer be a slave to sin and he will turn from and give up all evil ways. Though a Christian may struggle with sin and temptation in different forms, he will no longer live a lifestyle which is contrary to God's Word."

If you are an unrepentant sinner, please understand that you can "believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved."

Please come to Christ.

1-Pieter Friedrich's latest post

2003-10-24T19:58:00.000-07:00

Please comment here because he wouldn't let you at his own site - www.pieterfriedrich.com/blog - lest any more proof is needed that he though he may be a "man" of principle, he has flawed, non-Christian principles. He worships at the altar of hate and will turn black inside long before other alleged "non-believers."

He is proud of being narrow-minded so please feel free to spread.

HIS POST

Two of my recent posts ("Homosexuality: A Hate-Filled Lifestyle" and "Very Strange" have stirred up a hornets nest.

I've been called arrogant and judgmental, a fundamentalist, a closet homosexual, narrow-minded (I freely admit to this one, and I'm proud of it), a punk, and insane.

My character and up-bringing have been questioned. My request that unmarried females refrain from reading the incredibly vulgar details of homosexuality that I posted on the 21st has been mocked. I've been told I'm in need of an enema.

And on it goes. This is just a small sampling of what people have said about me.

I'm struck by two things.

1) Atheists, liberal Christians, homosexuals, and others have violently disagreed with me. They all chose to express their disagreement in most intolerant ways. I reject tolerance and am consequently declared anathema by those who worship Tolerance and Acceptance. Tolerance is a double-minded god who holds to a double-standard.

2) Not a single person has been able to refute the facts I presented my readers with.

Richard Hall attempted to argue with the claim that homosexuals tend to be much more pedophilic than heterosexuals, but all he managed to come up with was the statement that "homosexuals are no more likely to abuse children than heterosexuals."

Reader Celria argued that homosexuals are indeed born "gay," yet she ignores my previous arguments that it doesn't matter whether or not homosexuals are born "gay." She also ignores the fact that there is no proof that homosexuality is inborn. Finally, she ignores the fact that the facts I gave did not even mention whether or not homosexuals were born "gay"...however, she wouldn't know that since she (thank you, Celria) respected my request that unmarried ladies not read the graphic materials I posted.

Michael Demmons, the homosexual whose blogrolling of "Deux Ego" started it all, has completely ignored the facts about his lifestyle. Why? Because he cannot refute them and he cannot deny them.

So, I present those of my readers who disagree with me with a challenge. I cast my glove down, and dare anyone to take it up...if they can.

Since lobbing ad hominems at me and suggesting I'm insane does nothing to actually convince anyone I'm wrong, I ask bloggers who disagree with me to post a refutation on their blogs of the facts I presented.

If I'm as wrong as everyone seems to believe I am then it should be easy to refute me. Go ahead and do it.

However, since no one's been able to refute me thus far on my website, they've lost the opportunity to do it on my website. As I said, if you want to try and refute me, you'll have to do it on your own website, for your own readers to see.

Deal with the facts and leave the insults at the door.